Screen Removal Bargman L-300 Door Handle brakes Satellite Fuel Tank Fire Extinguishers Roof Antenna Tech Talk Forum Shortcut Motor Oil Window Generators headlights batteries Radiator AC Unit Grab Handle Wiper Blades Wiper Blades Door Locks Door Locks Door Locks Door Locks Rims Front Shocks Rear Shocks Front Tires Oil Filter Steps Roof Vent Awning Propane Tank Mirror Info Clearance Lights Clearance Lights Clearance Lights Clearance Lights Clearance Lights Spartan Chassis Gillig Chassis Freightliner Chassis P-32 Chassis MCC Chassis
    Forums    Tech Talk    32 foot Regency vs 34 foot Regency
Go to...
Start A New Topic
Search
Notify
Tools
Reply To This Topic
  
32 foot Regency vs 34 foot Regency
 Login now/Join our community
 
Picture of Fred & Cindy
posted
OK... I have what I think is a 32 foot 1990 Barth Regency diesel. However, I see some owners indicate they have a 34 foot 1990 Barth Regency diesel. Are there two different size Regency coaches for 1990? I am thinking that some owners are including their bumpers in the overall length. Would that be the correct way to measure?
 
Posts: 356 | Location: Missouri | Member Since: 06-24-2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Supporting Member of Barthmobile.com 1/12
Picture of Don in Niagara
posted Hide Post
What does your data tag say?
Mine says 9005-0140-34RDS-C3 which tells me it is a 34'. In fact it is 35'1" long bumper to bumper calculated by dropping a chalk mark vertically to the driveway pavement.
Don


1990 Regency 34'
Cummins 6CTA 8.3 240hp
Spartan Chassis,
4 speed Allison MT643
 
Posts: 630 | Location: Niagara Falls, Canada | Member Since: 11-09-2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Supporting Member of Barthmobile.com 6/17
Picture of Richard_Muise
posted Hide Post
This bugs me as well. My Barth says it is 33 feet long and I measured it atb35 plus feet bumper to bumper.


R.P.Muise 1994 Breakaway/Cummins 5.9/Allison transmission/Spartan Chassis
 
Posts: 662 | Location: Hampden, Massachusetts | Member Since: 10-13-2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Supporting Member of Barthmobile.com 8/10
posted Hide Post
quote:
My Barth says it is 33 feet long and I measured it atb35 plus feet bumper to bumper.



My "35 foot Royale" is 34 feet bumper to bumper...
 
Posts: 429 | Location: The Great Midwest | Member Since: 12-04-2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Supporting Member of Barthmobile.com 3/19
Picture of Mogan David
posted Hide Post
correct measurement for Barth is the length of the body only
 
Posts: 2003 | Location: Jackson, Michigan, USA | Member Since: 04-18-2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Supporting Member of Barthmobile.com 12/12
posted Hide Post
I am glad someone posted this as I wondered the same thing.

Tom Taylor
 
Posts: 306 | Location: Jacksonville FL | Member Since: 05-21-2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Supporting Member of Barthmobile.com 11/12
Picture of Nick Cagle
posted Hide Post
Want to add to the confusion about length? Ooops If your Barth has a bustle, it is not included in the length of the coach! hmm The bustle was a $500 storage option, so a 26 foot coach with a bustle is longer than a 26 foot coach without a bustle. confusion

Nick
 
Posts: 1732 | Location: Harlem, GA | Member Since: 09-17-2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Supporting Member of Barthmobile.com 8/10
posted Hide Post
quote:
correct measurement for Barth is the length of the body only


Whenever they measured the Royales, they must have been drunk....If I measured the 35ft Royale the correct way, then it would be maybe 33ft in length...Ha! Ha!

With a Barth, almost anything goes....
 
Posts: 429 | Location: The Great Midwest | Member Since: 12-04-2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

    Forums    Tech Talk    32 foot Regency vs 34 foot Regency

This website is dedicated to the Barth Custom Coach, their owners and those who admire this American made, quality crafted, motor coach.
We are committed to the history, preservation and restoration of the Barth Custom Coach.